© 2009 DailySEOblog.com Privacy policy
I list them out here, so that you can break out and clear them off, if at all you believed them. As DSB readers, I’m sure you know most of them already. Hope it helps.
Actually not. Even if you blocked a page through the “disallow” tag on robots.txt, Google might still crawl it following an external incoming link. The safest way to block out a page from being crawled 100% is to add a password secure login to that page. Bots won’t get past it.
No. Google’s algorithm has updated lately which will pick up matching lines/phrases from the page content to the search query and display selective parts of the content on the SERPs snippets. Particularly relevant for longer search queries.
Apparently not. Google will also check your posting/publishing frequency and set an appropriate crawling frequency based on it, despite your manual setting.
I wish if it did. In fact, a plugin will take care of the most important parts, but sometimes they do harm more than good. Like the auto generate meta description feature of All in One SEO, can create more duplicate entries in certain themes, if you set it to auto generate. Its always best to do it all manually, while leaving certain parts for the plugins.
Search Engines are clever enough to detect any particular patterns in the site content. While its best not to follow any predictable pattern, using them cleverly can give you results. Keyword Density is no longer a metric SE’s count, so get over it. Rather focus o relevancy factor.
Well, if it did, then I guess everyone would start doing the same and it would not make any difference. While linking to authority websites is a healthy habit, they don’t give you any added advantage.
Repeated this several times already. Page Rank has no direct association with your SERPs ranks, however getting a higher Page Rank means a lot of quality work and authority.
Header tags used in the content definitely supports SEO, but they are no stand alone factors that will directly give you any push.
No. Getting a relevant link from other sites is the better way to get indexed.
Not at all. Using flash will definitely give you less options for SEO compared to a content rich page, but that doesn’t mean bad SEO. You can focus on other SEO factors and get equally good if not better results.
WordPress is a great tool. But just adding one to your site/replacing with it will not give you any edge. You have to use it wisely to get the results.
Technically true, but its not just about the numbers. You have to use the proper anchor texts and use relevant link placement to get the maximum benefits.
Not any more. Trimming them to a much understandable format is better and saves a lot of time, however the most commonly used and avoidable parameters are “known” to Google and there is no extra effort required to convert them to an SEO friendly format, especially when the content is optimized and SE friendly.
Sitelinks are auto generated for websites with high traffic. There is nothing you can do control them except to block some of the links from appearing using WebMaster tools.
Meta Keywords help you in getting more clicks from the SERPs, by serving more like and ad copy. Stuffing them with keywords won’t help you at all. They have to be relevant, descriptive and attractive.
No. The page could still be crawled if the bots follow an external link to that page. Nofollow meta tag is not the surest way of keeping the bots away.
Again, bots will scan the page first as they land on them. But they will ultimately “forward” all the queries to the original URL. There are chances of Google looking into the landed page however.
Not always. Deep directories are fine as long as they are well linked and connected. An endless loop of deep directory is not good however.
Page Rank is determined based on who links to you and not always about whom you link to. There’s nothing to “preserve”.
It helps you make a spam of your site not SEO. In very less competitive spaces, it may give some immediate results, but you won’t see them sustain.
Not always. Bolding out important phrases/words using strong tags are okay as long as they are done in a non-spammy way. It doesn’t mean that every time you add them, there is a chance of search engines picking them up.
SEO is not a quick fix. It requires regular check ups and updates. Nothing can be achieved in short term.
Technically, nofollow links are not followed. But Google has its own signals to find out whether a nofollow links from a high authority site is relevant or not. So nofollow from high authority sites are always good, at least they’ll fetch you some extra links from other sites. So I can’t say that they are useless.
As you might already know there is never a guarantee. But quality SEO can always assure you good results.
Wish if it did. But if the nine others did extremely well as you, you’d again fall back. So its a continuous struggle and there is nothing permanent. So, what are the SEO myths that you think is popular among others. Would you like to add your own ?
SEO Auditor Features - Complete SEO audit - Competitor Analysis - Report generation Try it today ! |
Link Assistant Features - Easy Link Building - Finds link partners - Get backlinks regularly Try it today ! |
Rank Tracker Features - Rank Check reports - 558 Search Engines - Keyword Research Try it today ! |
Possibly related SEO & Social Media Articles
Awesome article.
I am very much impressed by the content in the form of Question and Answer pattern.
I really appreciate the effort taken by the team.
I too had a doubt if Robots.txt can keep a site from being crawled.
Thanks for the clarification.
Reply
Hi,
A good article.
However, just wanted to clarify the 6th point. Linking with reputed websites does give you added advantage of a higher page rank so y is it not important?
However, as you have mentioned page rank does not have anything to do with the rankings.
Then why is link formation an important aspect of SEO?
Cheers
Roopam
Reply
Mani Karthik Replied:
I repeat – “While linking to authority websites is a healthy habit, they don’t give you any added advantage.”
Let me know if it answered your question.
Reply
Hi.. nice blog…. About myth no 23 – incoming nofollow links. Are you sure about this? I have always believed that they will never be crawled and has no value at all. Where did you get this information?
Reply
Mani Karthik Replied:
Read this please.
Reply
Nice information about SEO facts.In the 21 myth Bolding out keywords on the content helps the search engines to pick up is a good information for me.Great info indeed.
Reply
HI Mani,
It is really nice to have all the doubts cleared about SEO
You have done great job by putting many things in single post. short and more informative. Thank you for the great post.
Thanks,
Krishna
Reply
[...] Myths We’ve discussed domain myths, so how about SEO myths? DailySeoBlog.com has published the top 25 common SEO myths. [...]
Great article. There are always different myths out there about the SEO industry and many people seem to think you can sprinkle magic fairy dust on a site and it will be SEOd and ready to rank in a week.
Reply
[...] Top 25 commonly believed SEO myths [...]
[...] ha publicado un interesante artículo sobre los mitos mas usuarios sobre el tema [...]
#22 – Should be #1 on the list. Great tips.
Reply
Hey mani
Nice post..
though if I go with your point 2, that means there is no point of using Description in all in one SEO settings ?
and H1 tag for wordpress is it a good idea?
I think most of theme are designed in a way to use title tag as H1/H2 tag
Though using H3 is a better idea, Correct me if I’m wrong..
Reply
Myth 14: Sitelinks are auto generated for websites with “high traffic.”
No not all. You’re wrong.
Sitelinks are auto generated for websites with lot of deep internal pages and not just “high traffic” alone. You could see sitelinks even for sites that barely get 100 hits or less a day.
Reply
Mani Karthik Replied:
As I understand, sitelinks are generated for sites with a stable ranking for one “flagship” keyword, a good amount of recognizeable inlinks with the same anchor text and also a good amount of traffic (not counting the other numerous factors that might go in.)
But I think you might have an example of a site with less than 100 hits a day with sitelink. Which one is it ?
Reply
Raj Replied:
My own site in the link here for “Raj.” It had sitelinks even before it was getting 100 hits a day.
This is what Google says: “Sitelinks enable users to jump directly to important parts of a site, which is often useful for large, complex websites.”
So it has nothing to do with traffic.
Furthermore, from yesterday onwards there is an improvement in sitelink functionality. A single row of links can now appear for results that didn’t show sitelinks before, even for results that aren’t in the first position. Check it out here: http://bit.ly/eo1t
Reply
man.. another good article.
every time i come here, you’ve got the great articles on seo.
thanks.
Reply
hey Great article thanks, I love to read your Blog,
Reply
Nice Article, Thanks Mani. But can’t follow all the points.
Reply
nice article.
If you really want to help people for doing own SEO, why dont you right a detailed blog about what should be the steps from start.
What tools should be used?
What kind of information you should collect before starting?
Thanks and Regards
Reply
Mani, great list of Myths there, I think i pretty much agree with all of them to an extent. Like you said, adding things like Wordpress isn’t a quick fix. Yes if you install Wordpress and use it properly, then it can help you produce content etc.
Another good myth that you have missed off is that Google completely ignores the META keywords tag. I’ve seen many SEO Blogs where the writer says don’t even bother, but in my opinion they are still worth adding if done accurately and modestly.
Reply
Good post mate. Thanks.
Reply
Hi mani.. am having little doubt in seo could you clear my doubt.
u hvi gud article to read.
Reply
Great List Mani, I didn’t read it all because I didn’t have time but I bookmarked the page and I will come back. Love your blog.
Mohammad Afaq
Free Website Traffic
Reply
Great post
I really love dailyseoblog.com
Mani you are Professional
Reply
great articles Mani,
ragarding no. 8, where i could find the h1 tag in blogger blog?
Reply
Its been fanastic information that you have shared with us all. In some topics, being an SEO company, I partially do not agree with you. I think that it has some importance……
Reply
[...] Common SEO Myths When creating web sites, you should always keep SEO in mind. Without traffic no web based business can survive, and organic SEO traffic is often the best (at least, cheapest) way to build traffic to your site. With that in mind, check out this great post on Top 25 commonly believed SEO myths. [...]
This is a good article from an “overly simplified” perspective.
So anyone who isn’t willing to delve deeper will continue to do a poor job and not truly grasp that “optimization” is only optimization when it’s thorough in all aspects.
Some inaccuracy also shows due to lack of depth.
For example you state:
“8. Adding H1 tags to keywords directly help in SEO.
Header tags used in the content definitely supports SEO, but they are no stand alone factors that will directly give you any push.”
Well, that’s contradictory. First, header tags DO support SEO, and thus, when properly implemented as one aspect of an overall SEO strategy, that DOES directly give you a push. So it is NOT a “myth”, and H1 tags (when properly used in balance) DO directly help in SEO.
Then here:
“9. Submitting to search engines is the only way to get indexed.
No. Getting a relevant link from other sites is the better way to get indexed.”
Not always. If I do my work properly for a niche market site, and use a sitemap.xml file, I can often get that site onto the first page of Google sooner than it might take to get indexed when the Googlebot eventually gets around to re-crawling that authority site. In that case, I have a business advantage in getting indexed sooner. And SEO is all about business advantage.
Reply
Mani Karthik Replied:
Hi Alan, I do agree that H1 tags work if put in the right mix. But myths, as they are beleived is that just adding H1 tags directly give a push. Which is ..a myth. They work best when every other factor too is set right.
On 9, I said getting a relevant link is the “better” way. I didnt say that it is the only or the best way. Sure there are other quicker methods, but there are two things here you should note. 1 – Relevant link (not just any link) and 2 – Better way (not the best way). So though submitting to dirs/ setting a sitemap may give you the same results, looking at it long term, a relevant, contextual text link from a good site sure is the better way out.
Thanks for the comments.
Reply
[...] Best in the Link Building Business: Most Linked-To Domains & P SEOmoz | Are You Leaking Juice? Top 25 commonly believed SEO myths – Daily SEO blog Opening Times – Is Your Site Open For SEO Business? | Local SEO Guide Link Building Guide | [...]
Great article
Clear & work
Thanks for share
Reply
[...] the full article here: Top 25 commonly believed SEO myths. Category: SEO, SEO Resource Tags: SEO, SEO Tips You can follow any responses to this [...]
I think far too many people put faith in the AllinOneSEO plugin. It’s a good start but everything that it does can be easily done without extra overhead. More importantly, if you have great content then you don’t need great SEO.
Reply
Outstanding article! This is like an eye opener for me as an SEO newbie. This just proves that SEO is a constantly evolving field. When I first started out as a web content writer, clients asked me to stuff as many as 35 keywords in a 500 word article. Now keyword density no longer seems as important.
Reply
[...] en DailySeoBlog [...]
[...] 25 common myths you should know about search engine [...]
I’m familiar with this things, but, however, it’s good to have them all at one place.
Thanks, Mani!
Reply
[...] you suggest some must-read SEO articles for webmasters? Read Google webmaster guidelines and Top 25 commonly believed SEO myths. Can’t really point out the rest, may be the archives on DSB itself is a good [...]
[...] you suggest some must-read SEO articles for webmasters? Read Google webmaster guidelines and Top 25 commonly believed SEO myths. Can’t really point out the rest, may be the archives on DSB itself is a good [...]
The trouble with a lot of SEO myths is that they can be partially true. Thanks for the post.
Reply