© 2009 DailySEOblog.com Privacy policy
If you’re a brand and you’d like to harness the power of social media (via Twitter), its honestly, a difficult situation to be in. Because Twitter is a community where the signal to noise ratio is really huge and you could make out the difference between spam and a genuine guy in the minimum possible time compared to any other social media channels.
For the same reason, life for brands on Twitter is tough for sure but not “un achievable” a target, or so do I prefer to believe. And I can substantiate my stand.
Obviously, there is no “power” held with popular people on social media, if at all there is anything that makes them popular, its because they are social. They interact, discuss, learn, make noise and have fun. Its because people like to have them within their circle of friends. So when brands get reluctant to get social, they fail.
Some brands hop on to Twitter hoping that they can shout about their products, and get people interested. That’s fine as long as you are an established brand like Coke or Obama. People will keep waiting for your updates, and they are okay if you only talk about yourself. But if you’re a brand that’s struggling to get attention, you got to mix it up until you reach an authority.
And don’t expect people to get all nice with you. They’ll ask questions, criticize or even bad mouth you. But all they want are answers. And when you don’t answer them at the right time, people will strike you off the list of their “trusted” friends.
Accepting mistakes are a great way to get close to people. I think its the most powerful and effective tool I know to win someone’s heart. Now, don’t get blind that discussing mistakes will mar your reputation. No. That’s a big mistake, when you accept and discuss mistakes, the one portion of the community who are “willing to befriend” you will stick with you. The other portion of critics will anyway go away, if you discuss it or not.
Brands exist because people use them. When they fail to understand people, they lose the game. And to understand people, you needn’t take mass psychology classes, just behave like you are one among them. When you fail to do that, the gap between the brand and user widens.
Being a good brand is half task done. But that’s not enough. You got to give value to your followers. May be an exclusive discount offer or an exclusive product review ? Use the principle of divide and rule. Give value/ Reward to your followers – leave the carrot dangling for the cynics – Leave your critics with no options. That would be a great way to make things interesting.
This is one factor I found very interesting with brands getting online. Most of the time, companies are “scared” to get social, while they want to make their presence social. And what happens is that they play a double game, which fires back at them. Many companies online draw rules left and right to keep “things in control” and what they don’t understand is that the rules in social media is not set by you but the people. So if you got to save you a** through all that’s happening around, you better be the fun-guy-around. Don’t get scared to talk to people, that’s not the essence of the whole idea.
Another strategy that’s a 100% winner all the time is creating opportunities and letting people win. Its easy to play it, but its not easy to take the initiative. Creating win-win situations is a must for any brand to succeed, and its one of the few ways available where you can get the users/followers involved. A nice example would be the “Tastecasting” thing that happened at a restaurant recently. Where a new product ( I guess pizza) was introduced to a bunch of tweeps from the locality. The restaurant could get a cost effective way of advertising their products while the tweeps felt happy that they were being treated exclusively as elite. Classic win-win situation.
Okay, so if you aren’t bothered at all about your users/people, you better get out of the way. This is hard to imagine but there are folks out there who don’t give a damn about what people think about them. I think this is a lie and only a big damn excuse.
Obviously, social media isn’t a place where you can expect magic to happen if you have a failed product. If you are one, better try rebuilding your brand and not pushing the same thing across to people.
GM Reinvention is a similar project that’s come out recently. When it met with the worst times in business, it embraced social media and came up with this new idea of limited products and introduced it through social media. Its getting great responses to the website now and I think this is a great way to rebuild your brand.
So, essentially, In Social Media, brands just don’t remain brands as in traditional media. They got to understand the pulse of the crowd and morph themselves in to a more..well “social” form to be successful one.
Its amazing what social media can give back to you. It always gives you back in multiples..always. You give them value, they give it back..a lot. You try to be smart, they get smarter !
SEO Auditor Features - Complete SEO audit - Competitor Analysis - Report generation Try it today ! |
Link Assistant Features - Easy Link Building - Finds link partners - Get backlinks regularly Try it today ! |
Rank Tracker Features - Rank Check reports - 558 Search Engines - Keyword Research Try it today ! |
Possibly related SEO & Social Media Articles
Hiya Mani! I haven’t been here for a while, but am following you on twitter though. It is actually amazing how much added value twitter delivers, and your take on the merits of proper social media branding is illustrated with such a brilliant visual comparison that there is just no arguing your point!
Reply
[...] 10 Reasons Why Brands Fail on Twitter/Social Networks [...]
Another great example is failure to properly brand yourself. You show a great example in your picture of how Pepsi has utilized the Twitter background image, while Coke has not.
How is the world to know that it is the real Coke, and not just some little kid in his basement pretending to be them?
Reply
Great write up and all very true. I would add it’s about the details (very evident in the case of Pepsi vs. Coke’s Twitter profile) and creativity. Honestly, you can’t be social without some creative thoughts and consistent efforts!
Reply
Why would Coca Cola even use the name of just one of its products as its identifier?
Oh, wait, because they didn’t.
http://www.twitter.com/cocacola
If you are going to create a graphic from two supposed corporate accounts it would be nice if you found their official tweet pages instead of the pages created by some fan, at best, possibly as the guy above me said “some little kid in his basement”
Reply
Hello Mani,
I’m a communication director from Germany and work in a mid-sized company (Please forgive me my Enlish mistakes I surly will do). We recently started an online campaign including twitter, Facebook, Youtube. A blog is going to follow as well.
Contrary to you, I do think a brand can get social as there is always someONE behind the brand (and not something). You can have a dialouge with each other and discuss things. And those people can be funny as well. Our twitter Account has about 120 Follower (we followe 140 freinds) with a good target audience which are interesed in new ways of production, new offers and so on. If they ask something, we answer (quick), if they say: What’s your opinion about this’n'that in our blog – we give a reply (quickly). As the brand. And everyone who follows the links to our website/twitter-acc can see who behind the brand is (two of our company).
Of course it’s wrong to only talk about the products. As more often you do, as more followers you lose. There must be a good mixture. We had building lot in front of our shop, noisy, very loud… and we took and uploaded some photos which had a lot of clicks and answers via twitter.
Point 4: Of course sometimes you have to accept mistakes. Everyone makes misktakes, even the men and women behind a brand. You just have to handle it the right way. We’ve a ompany here which recently had a PR desaster as it sued a blogger with about 400 readers only for some (not so nice) mentions of there new logo. This became public and all the bloggers and twitterers discussed about it and called the reaction over the top so that even the big medias in Germany had a topic.
Point 5 (don’t understand people): I agree.
Point 6 (missing added value): I already wrote about that.
Point 7: they can be fun.
Point 8: I agree.
Point 9: I agree.
Point 10: Well, if have bad products, social media is really not thw right way to get out of misery.
Kind regards from Germany
Andy
Reply
10 Reasons why brands fail on Twitter / Social Media – http://bit.ly/insC1 #socialmedia
Reply
Engaging with the internet community is the key to social media. Some companies seem to be juts jumping on the social media band wagon without actually knowing how to use these types of websites. This is a refreshing post to read.
Reply