The saga of “Natural links and Google” continues. The latest episode being this one from Matt, where he says that links must indeed be “natural” and not merely appear natural.
The entire SEO industry would completely agree to what Matt said. Links should be natural, and not “artificial”, but the problem is that not many people do understand Google’s version of “natural links”.
In my humble opinion any links placed irrelevantly anywhere on your site is a non-natural/artificial link.
So that includes, sponsored reviews, paid text links etc.
Now, if any of these “non-natural links are advertisements, then that’s completely different.
Advertisements are okay, even though technically they are “Nofollowed – Sponsored Links”.
- Because the link might take you to a non-contextual/non related source.
- Because the sponsored review post you did might totally be of of context of your domain.
And so, when google spiders your content, they might get “misleaded” to non trusty or simply non-relevant source.
Problem No.1
The problem with the web is that not all are SEO’s or webmasters. SEO’s constitute may be 20-30% of the web but the rest are people seriously dealing with great amount of information, be it on blogs or their websites. And not all of these people know that Google doesn’t quite like you to plug that link of your friends or the guy who paid you to do so.
Problem No.2
Google does not and I firmly believe that it cannot ever give us concrete rules on what artificial links are. Because clearly, not everyone on the internet can take Goog’s perspective, and Google knows it best. Here’s an example.
Go to this post on the Google official blog – http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/day-in-cloud-challenge-featuring-google.html
In the post Google posts a link to Virgin America. Its contextual technically because the blog post deals with a contest. Fair enough. But I’m wondering how would Google see this had the post been on a normal blog ?
- The link on the Google blog is not nofollowed. But can it be left the same way in another low profile blog ?
- The link is to a reputed website (of virgin america), but does that mean every webmaster can follow what Google did and link to any website that they might think is “friendly and reputed?”
Now, this is the problem with natural links. What is natural to you may not be natural to Google. And sadly, not everyone are webmasters and SEO’s to understand this.
If only Google came up with a clear and precise explanation on what “natural links” are.
SEO Auditor Features - Complete SEO audit - Competitor Analysis - Report generation Try it today ! |
Link Assistant Features - Easy Link Building - Finds link partners - Get backlinks regularly Try it today ! |
Rank Tracker Features - Rank Check reports - 558 Search Engines - Keyword Research Try it today ! |
Possibly related SEO & Social Media Articles
Liked the ‘If only Google…’ in the end. But I think you already have the answer under “Problem No.2″
Reply
Mani Karthik
Replied:
I don’t think G can do it, its one of their “hmm it could be this..cold be that” kind of moment.
Reply
What natural links are to you may not be natural to Google … http://tinyurl.com/map8fm
Reply
socialhelp: What natural links are to you may not be natural to Google … http://tinyurl.com/map8fm
Reply
The saga of “Natural links and Google” continues http://tinyurl.com/map8fm
Reply
What natural links are to you may not be natural to Google http://tinyurl.com/map8fm by @ManiKarthik
Reply
The fact that Google’s standards needs interpreting leaves space for seo-savvy individuals to actually sell their services….how accurate various individual’s advise is remains to be seen, however.
Reply
hey, I also very much consufed about google’s policy ,recently my web site went to PR 2 from Pr 1 and blog went to Pr 1 from PR 0 ,in the same month suddenly (last week) my all page ranks went down to 0 . It is a sad suddent atack ,and I am unable to find the reason ,but i have so many natural links in my posts so ppl say i have more out bound links than inbound ,do you thing that is the problem or this is due to my 10 paid links (more with relevant sites)
Reply
Mani Karthik
Replied:
Its probably got to do something with the paid links than the contextual ones. If they were evident as “paid links”, then I’m pretty sure you invited trouble. May be you should strip them off and file a reconsideration req. The chances are bleak though.
Reply
s.manimaraa
Replied:
hi ,thanks a lot ,how to file a reconsideration to google.
Reply
Hi there Mani,
That is a lot of information about natural links and how google reads them. I might have to do some more in-depth analysis on this topic. Thanks for sharing this valuable information.
Cheers,
Eddie Gear
Reply
Mani Karthik Thanks . I got my PR back after sending reconsideration request to google
Reply
Mani Karthik
Replied:
Congrats Manimara, you are luck, not everyone get successful with reconsideration requests.
Reply