Just logged off from the Google Webmasters Tricks and Treats event and it was fun and tiring !
The session started off with presentations from Googlers on various topics such as “Myths in SEO” and ended with a vibrant question answer session on the Google Moderator tool. The panel was awesome with Matt Cutts and Adam Lasnik in the lead, and some 400 plus SEO’s and Webmasters in the chat !
It was exciting to be a part of the discussion because this time around, we got to listen the “real stuff” from the horse’s mouth. And what more can we get ?
Here are some of the interesting questions and their answers.
Adam reinforced this once again that there is NO particular percentage keyword density that webmasters need to follow on their pages to “artificially” highlight keywords. The focus is more on relevancy of the page as a whole and just by increasing the keyword density and using variations of it, one cannot force search engines to get “ideas” off a page.
There is no such thing as “ill effects” of being on a shared IP. Google understands that exclusive IPs are not within everyone’s reach and it is not a webmasters fault that he is on a shared IP. In fact,what’s more important is the content of your website and who links to you, than who shares your IP. It is very possible that you are the only non-porn guy on a shared IP, which is shared with 99 of the porn/poker/pharma guys. That does not mean that you are going to be penalized. But as usual, if you don’t have any valuable backlinks or popularity, you should not blame it on the ip for not enjoying the positions on SERPs, It’s probably a problem with your content.
Google also suggested that quality servers are better than cheap ones as cheap ones prefer to accommodate a lot more websites than the normal rate and tend to give more down times and glitches. This may not help the user and in turn the search engines. Try to stick to a reliable host with decent uptimes and less crashes.
Apparently, no. W3C validation is again more a technical thing that not all would be aware of. Imagine a yoga teacher designing a page himself with valuable information. If his page does not validate, that does not mean that his information is bad. So google gives more importance to the relevancy factors of a site than the W3C validation issues.
A lot more SEO stuff was discussed at the event, that it was overwhelming. There were as usual lot of questions on penalizations and “I lost my PR F*&%^ you Google” kind of questions on chat, but I think the folks at Google made it clear again that those are the things you should ignore, and focus more on the user experience.
SEO Auditor Features - Complete SEO audit - Competitor Analysis - Report generation Try it today ! |
Link Assistant Features - Easy Link Building - Finds link partners - Get backlinks regularly Try it today ! |
Rank Tracker Features - Rank Check reports - 558 Search Engines - Keyword Research Try it today ! |
Possibly related SEO & Social Media Articles
Thanks for posting this Mani! It’s good to know that they aren’t penalizing smaller webmasters who can’t currently afford dedicated hosting.
Reply
Hey, now that Google cleared all the doubts, I am wondering, is Search Engine Optimization any different from website optimization and quality content writing?
Is SEO a career anymore? Isn’t the so called SEO techniques just fit in a 5 page document and the knowledge of using the Google webmaster tools?
As the search technology Google uses improve day by day, the crawlers started behaving as if human viewing and indexing the pages, isn’t the SEO job becoming more of a secretary job than a brainy thing?
Just thinking loud so that I can get some input and make a few decisions!
Reply
@Tyler – Yea Goog realizes that not everyone can afford dedicated IPs.
@Sree – You are right and wrong. Right because – Googe algo is growing more diverse and “user-inclined”, and SEO techniques are constantly changing. From simple formulas of KW density to complicated threads of social media. Which is good.
Wrong because, SEO is evolving in to more complex alogs in social media, user interaction, patterns etc. And as you rightly said the five page “formulas” are dead and will keep dying, but at the same time evolve into much more meaningful, updated algos. That’s the beauty.
Following a pattern in what we do is probably the most dangerous thing to do these days. SEO 3.0 will talk about the crowd, user preferences and user interaction. That’s a big jump.
Reply
Mani, very nice post and blog too. I too attended that session and it was nice to talk to all the attendees.
You had very rightly said in your comment that SEO is getting tougher day by day with the search engines changing their algos all the time. It has become a much more challenging task…
Reply
One more point i can remember that Matt was saying in the chat “There’s always the chance that we’ll discount directory links in the future”. Huhh what happens to the directory owners now who vested a lot in them
Reply
I’ve always said, I write for the reader first and the SE’s third
Reply